Connect with us

Dodger Baseball

Is The Hall of Fame Still Relevant?

I have always considered a player’s election to the hall as the ultimate reward for a great career. But lately it has seemed to me that the merely very good are going in.

That is simply my opinion. Now that being said, Rolen was a legitimate candidate. He got in because the voters in the BBWAA are more in tune with sabermetrics and combine fielding and hitting stats.

As the older writers fade from the scene, the younger ones tend to be more stat driven than the old guys were. But there were numbers that meant almost certain HOF enshrinement. 300 wins, 400 homers, the number of awards a player might garner over his career.

Some players, like Dale Murphy, fell just short of those numbers and have not been elected even by the Veterans committee. Fred McGriff made it this year, but in my mind, Fred should have been in long ago. My reason? The man has exactly the same number of homers as Hall of Famer, Lou Gehrig. Of course it took Fred longer, and he was not the icon Gehrig was. But I always felt he was deserving.

Another thing that has skewed the election process some is the PED mess. Only one player who was accused of using, but never proven, has been elected to the Hall. Mike Piazza. Guys like McGwire, Palmeiro, and Sosa have not even come close to election. Palmeiro is a member of the 500 HR club.

Palmeiro had never hit more than 37 HR’s through his age 29 season, then he went on a nine year tear that never saw him hit less than 38. McGwire likewise is a 500 HR club member. He fell just 17 short of 600. Sosa is the only player in MLB history to hit 60 or more 3 times. Over a four year stretch, 98-01, he hit 243 homers. In case you’re wondering, that is 60 a year.

But they were all caught up in the PED era. Barry Bonds’ last time on the ballot this year saw him fall short again. He did garner 66% of the vote. My guess is that as the years pass, people will tend to mellow and he will be elected by the Veterans committee.

Roger Clemens, I am not so sure about. He has 7 Cy Young awards. No one else comes close. The problem is 4 of those came after the age of 34. Pitchers usually do not get better as they age. They always lose something.

But back to the main theme. There are several players in the Hall right now whose numbers seem to fall short. Bill Mazeroski was a defensive whiz for his time. He was a mediocre hitter and his one claim to fame was blasting a walk-off World Series winning homer against the Yankees in 1960.

Ozzie Smith is another who got in mainly because of his glove. His bat improved after he was traded to the Cardinals. With the Padres he was great glove no bat.

Harold Baines is another. He was mainly a DH the last several years of his career. I even remember the hubbub when Jim Rice was elected. Most felt his numbers were not good enough to be enshrined.

As far as former Dodgers are concerned, I try to detach myself from the fact that they are my team and see exactly where a player merits election, or in many cases, where he falls short.

I have seen many fans who believe that Steve Garvey, Maury Wills, Fernando Valenzuela and Orel Hershiser belong in the hall.

Of those four, I think two have a legitimate shot down the road. Wills changed the game. Before Maury, speed had become an afterthought. He brought the stolen base back in a big way. And he earned an MVP award doing it. His last showing with the Veterans committee fell short. But I think in a few years he might garner enough support for election.

Fernando is having his uniform number retired this year. They are finally making official what has been unofficial since he retired. He will become the second, non-Hall of Fame player to be so honored by the Dodgers. Jim Gilliam is the other. Gilliam spent his entire baseball career with the Dodgers as a player and a coach. He was loved and respected by everyone in the organization.

Fernando pitched for five other teams besides the Dodgers in his career. His numbers, while good, are nowhere near Hall worthy. He did win a Cy Young and a ROY award. But he only won 20 games one time. But I do think he will eventually be elected for his impact on the game. He  brought the Hispanic fans together and they have remained loyal to the Dodgers and have become a huge part of fan culture.

All you need to do to understand that is look at the city connect uniforms the Dodgers wear occasionally sporting the Los Doyers logo. He also could go in via the same route as Jaime Jarrin as a Spanish language broadcaster. He is already part of the Legends of Dodger Baseball family.

One of the players who will be inducted into that group this season is Orel Hershiser. Hershiser had two outstanding seasons in LA. The rest of his career in LA he was either just above .500, or just below it. It all culminated when he had a season to remember in 1988. Cy Young Award, 59 consecutive scoreless innings, an MLB record, MVP in the 88 World Series.

But if you check the numbers, he falls short. 204 career wins, but only one 20 win season. You can say the same about Don Sutton, who had only one 20 win season, but he won over 300 games. He went in because of longevity and the 300 wins was the standard at the time.

Hershiser never led the league in any of the major stats like strikeouts or ERA. Orel was simply a very good pitcher, and for one shining moment, he was magical.

Garvey is a much easier call for me to not make the Hall. Garvey was a first baseman who did not reach gaudy power numbers. He did win an MVP award in 1974.

He also still holds the NL record for consecutive games played. But Garv hit more than 30 homers once. He never led the league in any of the major hitting stats. Over his career he is only a 38 WAR player. And todays’ electors are looking at that stat more and more. Garvey also fell short this year in the veterans vote.

I really do not believe he will ever garner enough support for election. I do think the Hall is still relevant, I think election is still quite an honor. But the parameters the players are judged on have changed drastically. Kershaw is going to go over 200 career wins this season. He has already passed Koufax, and he is 12 wins shy of matching Drysdale’s 209.

I do not think he will beat Sutton’s team mark of 233. But according to almost any pundit or analyst you listen to, Kersh is a lock for the Hall. Koufax got in on the strength of 6 outstanding seasons. Kershaw has been consistent in his career and at times, outstanding. He has the same number of Cy Youngs that Sandy has. And he is probably the best pitcher of his generation.

That is one of the criteria I go by. That is why I was always miffed that it took so long for Gil Hodges to be elected. Hodges was far and away the best and most productive first baseman of the 50’s. He and Snider hit the most home runs in the 50’s. He should have been elected by the writers. But at least he is in there now with his teammates.

There are some locks coming up on the ballot in the next few years. Ichiro and Beltre should both be elected next year. Todd Helton, who came really close this year, might lose a little support with those two on the ballot, but then again, all three of them could go in next year.

Albert Pujols is another lock and most likely first ballot choice when he becomes eligible in five years. I just hope I am around long enough to see that. Albert is one of the all-time good guys.




Notify of
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Sam Oyed

Former Dodger Ed Rios has been signed by the Cubs.


HOF. Have to admit I’ve lost interest. I’ll read about it of course, but I have no opinion about who goes in. It’s kinda like “and the Oscar goes to”. Good for them. Now, what should I have for dinner?


That’s a slap in the face Badger.


Hope it didn’t leave a mark Bum.

Sounds like maybe you still care. Not caring anymore can be soothing.




Referencing Will Smith vs Chris Rock.


Have never cared


Strong position to take Dion.

Fred Vogel

What about All-Star games, in any sport? Those are definitely irrelevant to me.


HOF has lost some of its luster over the past decade. If they start putting the steroid players in, the luster will be completely gone and will leave nothing but tarnish.

My feeling is, if you have to think about a players worthiness of the HOF for more than 5 minutes, they don’t belong. The players in the hall should be no doubt greats. Not borderline very good to great. That is what the team HOFs are for.


I agree with that point. My view is that the Hall is becoming simply another museum. If so, state it as such and go from there. Football’s hall has elected a lot more borderline greats than baseball has over the last several years.


And to your point. The Football Hall Of Fame is more of a museum than a shrine.


Same with the basketball hall.

Farhan Friedman

The problem I have with the HOF is with the voters. Many times it comes down to bias. The current non voting of Jeff Kent comes to mind. Another issue to me is if the player with the most hits ever and the player with the most home runs ever are not in the HOF, to me, its not a legitimate HOF no matter the argument.

Jeff Dominique

FF, I apologize for the delay in the approval of your initial post. I still have not recovered from COVID, and I was not able to view the site until later on Saturday. There should be no delays in your future posts.

Welcome to LADC. It is especially satisfying with new commenters.


I agree that there is definitely bias. Kent is one example; Gary Sheffield would be another. As for Rose, I have no sympathy for Pete. I saw the man play many times and he was one of the most intense competitors ever, He came to beat you anyway he could. He knew the rules, they are posted in every clubhouse in the major leagues. He continually denied he had gambled. Even when he was confronted with the evidence. He then willingly accepted the lifetime ban given him by Bart Giamatti. Subsequent commissioners have denied his requests for reinstatement. If you reinstate Rose, then you have to reconsider a couple of the Black Sox. As for Bonds, I think the writers got it right. He too denied and denied. You do not get better like he did as you age. Had he not done what he did, he already had HOF credentials. Any player who willingly uses any kind of drug that is deemed illegal by MLB does not belong in the Hall regardless of his accomplishments.


And their records should be wiped off the books. Or, at the very least they should have an asterisk on them.


I read this morning on MLBTR that Machado had given the Padres until the 16th of February to work out an extension of his deal. They offered 5/105 which would have made it a 10/255 deal. He refused that naturally. Last night on Baseball tonight they speculated that Machado, who will be only 31 next season, could receive as much as 35-40AAV. I believe he ends up with one of the New York teams, both of whom will need a 3rd baseman next year.


Manny is 31 this season, 32 next year. I would look for a downward trend soon. I don’t think he’s going to be worth $40 million.

Last edited 1 year ago by Badger

He turns 31 in July. So he will be 31 when he signs his next contract. Do I think he gets 40 mil a year? No, but he will get more than he is making now, just how much AAV he actually gets remains to be seen, but the MLB Tonight analysts all agree he will get between 35 and 40.


For how long? He’s currently got $32 million a year until he turns, 36, before the All Star break in ‘28. That’s a sweet deal. What does he want instead of that? He just had the best season he’s gonna have going forward. $32 million is roughly 4 WAR. He can maybe average that for the next 5 years. After that?

I will of course be rooting against him for the rest of his career. I’m shallow that way.

Last edited 1 year ago by Badger

Well he and his team obviously think they can do better.

Sam Oyed

Sometimes shallow is good.

Jeff Dominique

When this was first broached, I mentioned that I did not think that the Padres would extend Machado at what he wanted. My point was that the Padres already have 2 $30MM SS, and Tatis can reassume his SS position next year, with Bogaerts moving to 3B. That will leave the $30MM + that Machado would have received to spend on Ohtani and/or Urías.


They still have to consider what they want to do with Soto. Who is by far the youngest of the group.


Soto is an interesting study. Did he peak at 22? He ended the year with a decent WAR total, but clearly his performance dropped off in San Diego. He certainly projects a great year. I expect him to OPS at or near .900 this year. Same with Tatis.

Must See

More in Dodger Baseball

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x