The Dodgers have a new shortstop. Or do they? Miguel Rojas is a proven MLB defensive SS with a career slash line of .260/.314/.358/.672, and a career OPS+ of 85. His strikeout percentage was 12% last year, with a 12.6% career strikeout percentage. There is no denying that Rojas is not a major offensive threat, but he will put the ball in play, and he will save runs.
Rojas is back with LAD for his second stint. He was signed by the Dodgers to a MiLB contract in November 2012. He joined the LAD roster in 2014, but did not show at that time that he would be anything more than a AAAA player than have a 9 year career. In one of AF’s first transactions (December 2014), Rojas was traded with 2B Dee Gordon, RHP Dan Haren, and cash to Miami Marlins, for LHP Andrew Heaney, RHP Chris Hatcher, 2B Kiké Hernandez and C Austin Barnes. Heaney was then traded to LAA for Howie Kendrick.
Is the plan to put Rojas at SS and leave Gavin Lux at 2B? Or do the Dodgers really need yet another utility player? Could this be a pre-cursor to a CT3 trade? Speculation will be rampant, as there are those who are pooh-poohing this trade. I am an avid Jake Amaya fan, but I have no issues with this trade.
Rojas has been a defensive whiz since he first played at the ML level with the Dodgers in 2014. So much so that I can still remember his back hand stab and throw from behind third base on June 18, 2014, to keep Clayton Kershaw’s no hitter intact. I did not see it with my eyes, but I sure saw it from my mind’s eyes from the voice of Vin Scully.
I published a post several days ago about how important run prevention was to me. The Dodgers could not possibly go into the season with Muncy, Lux, Vargas (2nd /SS/3B) as the primary infield, could they?. With Mookie Betts, Freddie Freeman, Will Smith, JDM, Max Muncy, Gavin Lux, and potentially Miguel Vargas, can they make up for the weak bat of Rojas, as long as he puts up GG level defense?
Many were looking for the Dodgers to sign José Iglesias, and admittedly I was in favor early on in the off season. His career slash line is .279/.319/.382/.701. Not a great difference than the career stats of Rojas. But there was no way that Iglesias was the equal to Rojas defensively. While Iglesias is a better offensive threat, would Iglesias’ bat be that much of a difference? The team needs defense more than offense. They should have the offense to score a lot of runs this year. I guarantee you that with the restructured infield, the pitchers are happier today than they were yesterday.
Okay, that is only part of the picture. The Dodgers needed to trade Jake Amaya to get Rojas. While there are those who believe that Amaya can do anything that Rojas can do, I am not in that camp. Amaya has never done it at the ML level what Rojas has done for 9 years. If players can duplicate what they do at AAA at the MLB level, then why have a AAA. Why are so many convinced that Amaya will put up Rojas numbers? Maybe he will. Probably not. The Dodgers might as well just call up last year’s AAA team. Jake Lamb, Kevin Pillar, and Eddy Alvarez all put up much better numbers in OKC, but could not do so with the ML club, and Lamb and Pillar were proven ML players. Jake Lamb was even less productive in Seattle than he was with LAD.
Dodger player personnel execs are obviously not convinced that Amaya can be a ML regular, or at least not at the level of Rojas. If they did believe that, they would never have made the trade. Chances are the Dodgers would have been more comfortable with Michael Busch in the lineup than Amaya. Busch is a much better offensive threat, but he will undoubtedly start the season at OKC. The Dodgers are planning on at least two rookies as position players on the roster, and at least one rookie pitcher. They did not have a single rookie exceed rookie status in 2022. Three rookies planning on being significant players at the ML level, is not something the Dodgers have been comfortable with. They were never going to rely on Amaya to be that ML SS.
There is not a single publication that believes that Amaya is anything more than a utility infielder, and only as a defensive replacement. Are they always correct? No, but they generally have a better understanding of what makes for a ML regular than the average fan.
IMO, Amaya will be a good utility infielder at the ML level, and should have a productive ML career. But not in 2023. Rojas’ ML experience and GG level glove, gives the Dodgers a better team in 2023 than Amaya’s promise.
Amaya is not even projected to be the regular SS for Miami. Right now, Joey Wendle is the first SS on the Marlins depth chart. Amaya is probably ticketed to Jacksonville, the International League AAA affiliate of Miami.
I will follow Amaya’s career, and hope he will become a productive ML player. But for 2023, I will be more comfortable with Miguel Rojas.
Well, we are over the CBT for now. Gotta figure there are moves coming one way or another.
More moves. One or both of Taylor and Muncy will have to go to stay under the CBT.
They were going over the CBT anyway as soon as all of their arbitration eligible players sign.
Yes. Lux, Rojas, Muncy, Yonny and Taylor seems like more infield flexibility than is needed. Rojas puts them @ 5 mill over the threshold.
The team would be over the threshold without this trade via the arbitration cases.
I read yesterday, but haven’t confirmed, that the date when teams are deemed “under” or “over” the threshold is at the END of the MLB season.
If this is true, it changes the dynamic entirely for me, in that there’s a lot more time to move Treinen, CT3 or other high-salary to create space.
“the threshold is at the END of the MLB season.”
I read that too, mentioned it the other day. Deadline moves could decide where we are in relation to CBT threshold.
Yes. But now, we are way over.
Barely over. Rojas only makes 4.5 mil.
Here’s where we differ.
“He’s already done it at Major League level”
Done what? He has a career OPS+ of 85. That is below ML average. I think Amaya could do that. The only reason he hasn’t is because he has been blocked. And now it appears another move needs to be made to accommodate Rojas.
Could this be happening because the Dodgers don’t believe in Taylor anymore?
Its not that I don’t like Rojas. He is starter material on a non competitive team like Miami and would be a fine backup on the Dodgers. I guess I’m just surprised by this move.
Shoes are dropping. We will soon know if Rojas is the Dodgers starting shortstop or is a precursor to trading Taylor.
If Rojas winds up being the shortstop then Lux will most likely be the second baseman. That moves Muncy to third and Vargas to left field, right? If so, what happens in 2024 when Rojas and Muncy could be gone? That leaves a hole at short and third again.
Shoes are dropping.
1. They do not need another move for Rojas. Amaya was on the 40 man.
2. I am surprised that you only look at offense when
evaluating a player’s worth to a team. I do not care what his OPS+ is. I figure
that Mookie, Freddie, Fresh Prince, JDM, and Lux can make up for any shortfall.
You keep advising us that Muncy is going to have an .800+ OPS. Everyone keeps
telling us that Vargas is the real deal and will hit .300 at MLB. With the LAD lineup, I am guessing that Rojas
will see a few more fastballs than he would see with the Miami lineup.
But where are those DRS and OAA going to come from? They were going to be very negative with Muncy at 2B, Lux at SS, and Vargas at 3B. Now Lux goes back to 2B where he is probably more comfortable and his weak arm will be just fine. Muncy goes back to 3B where he was + defender (albeit with the shift), and Rojas is a legit GG caliber glove at SS. The pitchers will be much happier pitching to soft contact and ground balls. With his glove, I will take his 85 OPS+.
3. Amaya was never going to be the LAD regular SS. He had 2
more option years before he needed to stay on the roster. As bad as you seem to
think Rojas’ bat is, it is better than Amaya’s. Show me one talent evaluator
who thinks that Amaya has a ML bat. His value is purely as a defensive role player.
Miami considers Joey Wendle a better option at SS, and Jon Berti as a
better utility infielder. Depth charts shows him at AAA. He cannot make the
Marlins lineup as a regular, but he is a regular SS for a WS contender?
4. Amaya was going back to AAA for LAD. He would be no help for the Dodgers ML team in 2023, whereas Rojas will be. The Dodgers were so enamored with Amaya that they signed Yonny Hernandez to a ML contract, not a MiLB with a ST invite. This was a straight one-for one swap where AF/BG believes that Miguel Rojas is a better player for 2023 than Jake Amaya. I am not concerned with 2024 and beyond. The Dodgers will find a SS next year. I am guessing that Amed Rosario will be at the top of their wish list.
5. I have no desire to come across as a negative on Amaya. I love Jake Amaya, but as a defensive utility infielder. I hope he goes off with Miami, and proves all of the talent evaluators (and me) wrong. And while I am not putting you in this category, there are too many out there who believe that LAD MiLB players are better than ML players and should never be traded. For every Julio Rodriguez and Adley Rutschman out there, there are 28+ Jarred Kelenic’s and Mickey Moniak’s to compensate. If going from AAA to MLB was so easy, they would all do it. Maybe Amaya would have gone on and been another Brendan Donovan, but I do not think so.
There apparently was another reason for Rojas’ inauspicious bat in 2022. He needed wrist surgery.
https://www.mlb.com/news/miguel-rojas-right-wrist-surgery
I wasn’t referring to the 40 man, I was referring to the CBT cap. I was under the impression the Dodgers were trying to reset. Maybe not.
You think I didn’t look at Amaya’s defensive capabilities? I’m surprised you would think that. I read the scouting report. Fielding was his highest grade. Those DRS numbers you refer to could possibly come from him. Miami seems to think so. Straight up for a 34 year old $5 million mostly bottom of the order hitter on a 69 win club.
Everyone said Vargas would hit .300? I didn’t.
I don’t just look at OPS+. Just thought I would mention it. Amaya has improved offensively OPSn .748 at OKC. Rojas projects an OPS of .669 next year. I’m merely suggesting maybe Amaya could do that hitting fastballs from the 9 hole.
I didn’t advise anyone that Muncy was going to OPS .800. I think he certainly can, but as I sarcastically mentioned yesterday he ONLY needs to add 50 points to both his average and OBP.
I’m not convinced the Dodgers are “a WS contender”. Not at this point. We lost 2 top of the order hitters and arguably our best pitcher. And that’s from a team that got blowed out in their first round last year.
Doesn’t sound to me like you love Jacob Amaya.
Admittedly I did think you were referring to the 40 man. However, if the Dodgers were truly concerned about getting under the CBT threshold, the trade for Rojas does not alter the fact that they need to move a CT3 or Max Muncy payroll to get under. They were going over anyway. I am not convinced that was a consideration in this trade.
You need to go back and read some of my articles just on Amaya. I wish Harold was still around, because he and I would constantly talk about my affinity for Amaya and his affinity for Zach McKinstry. Neither one of us believed that either player was destined to be a regular with the big league team. He and I would often pick players who were not considered top prospects and write about.
Because I do not think he is a ML regular SS does not make me a hater. I am not alone. Find one talent evaluator who thinks he is an everyday SS at the ML level. He has been dropping in the prospect ranks. He is considered the top defensive player for LAD, but that is for a team that is devoid of good defensive players. Give me one LAD infield prospect who is considered a good defender. He did not get one vote as a top defensive prospect for MiLB prospects in a recent poll. Rojas is a two-time GG finalist at the ML level.
Maybe advise was a bit strong. But when the conversation was about Muncy a while back, you were adamant that you thought that Muncy would get back to .800 OPS. And he may. I certainly did not disagree with you at the time, and I do not now.
Besides Trea Turner, what other top of the order players did the Dodgers lose? Betts and Freeman are still there. Smith, Muncy, Lux, Thompson, CT3 are all still there. JDM is replacing the bat of JT. They are replacing Cody Bellinger with James Outman. And while maybe you did not say that Vargas will hit .300, others have. So while the use of the word “everybody” was a bit hyperbolic, I do believe that Vargas will put up better numbers than Muncy did last year.
You said…”Miami seems to think so. Straight up for a 34 year old $5 million mostly bottom of the order hitter on a 69 win club.” And yet Amaya is not on the current Miami depth chart. He is ticketed for AAA, just like he would have been with LAD. More importantly than what Miami thinks of him (or you or I), a far better barometer in the Rojas/Amaya comparison is what the player personnel people for the team that has won more games than any other team since AF has been with the Dodgers thinks. It looks like they think Rojas is better.
Amaya will have a good career as a utility infielder. Nothing wrong with that.
BTW, I do not think either team is done with trades. The Fish could still move Joey Wendle, but Jazz Chisholm and Jean Segura are not going anywhere. Jon Berti does not have a lot of trade value unless packaged with a pitcher. That would open a spot for Amaya as the utility player. They could also package Amaya with a pitcher.
The Fish need OF. I would hazard a guess that Miami might have asked for either James Outman or Andy Pages, and AF/BG hung up the phone.
Jeff, I agreed with Badger regarding your comment … ““He’s already done it at Major League level”
That’s not the best argument you could have made regarding how much better the Dodgers are with Rojas instead of Amaya. I do agree with you that Rojas is an upgrade over Amaya for 2023. If Rojas winds up as a utility player then a lot of his superiority over Amaya goes away.
In this back and forth, no one is really talking about the clubhouse presence and veteran leadership that Rojas brings. The Dodgers are already taking a chance by inserting rookies in the starting role in two positions. Are you going to suggest that Amaya, who has never even seen MLB pitching or stood on a major league infield, is now going to take over the most important infield position on a team with high playoff expectations like the Dodgers, a team already starting two rookies?
The who-is-better argument is kind of moot. Amaya and Rojas are essentially the same guy in terms of talent ceiling. Rojas has just proven it over many years and is a known quantity, and brings lots of MLB experience to a team that will need it. Amaya may turn into a Rojas at some point, but the Dodgers need that guy NOW, not three years from now.
Good point.
Evidently the Mets used the same doctor as the Giants to review Correa’s medicals. You would have thought they’d seek a second opinion.
Likely Rojas is a 1 year stopgap to solidify the defense. If he’s pure crap, then may be we go find a shortstop at the all star break.
But more importantly, now that Amaya is gone, who’s next in line to perhaps be our future SS? Who gets the SS job in AA or AAA, with an eye towards LA?
Choose:
https://www.spotrac.com/mlb/free-agents/2024/shortstop/
Amed Rosario!!!
Adames in ‘25!
I am okay with that.
Rather have Rosario next year, Why wait until 25 to upgrade>>> >>>?????
I hear Friedman is consulting with Rob Pelinka regarding building a team around Betts and Freeman.
Pelinka has certainly shown his skill level at such endeavors.
This is a problem I have been writing on for some time. There is no SS or CF pipeline. With Rojas, Yonny Hernandez now figures to move down to OKC for SS with Michael Busch at 2B. The Dodgers will sign another AAAA SS for depth at OKC. Devin Mann will be the OKC utility player (inf/of). Eddys Leonard will be the SS at Tulsa (AA). Alex Freeland and Rayne Doncon are next in line, but they will be in A ball this year. Dodger MiLB SS are going to need to be pushed to see what they have.
Maybe they sign Andrelton Simmons to a MiLB contract with a ST invite, but with the understanding that he is ticketed to OKC for emergency. The Dodgers have options. The SS does not have to be an All Star. Not one of the 4 elite SS were even in the Championship Series last year. 2 did not make the playoffs. That is because a SS cannot win it by themselves. They need a team. The Dodgers are a better team today with Miguel Rojas than they were yesterday.
It also does not necessarily close the door on José Iglesias
The Dodgers roster is not done (IMO).
I agree that the Dodgers roster is not yet complete, but under what circumstances would they add Iglesias?
Even if they were to trade CT3 (and I think that would be difficult at this point, although maybe less so at the deadline in July), I would think they would replace him with someone who could play both infield and outfield.
I think their main objective at this point is to see if they can come up with a better than average center fielder in a trade between now and the start of ST.
I used Iglesias as an example. I do not believe the Rojas trade takes anything away from what they are planning. Do I think they will sign Iglesias or Andrus? Absolutely not. Is it possible? Yes. I just do not think Rojas is the final move, and another SS is not out of the question.
I’ve been saying this too
“There is no SS or CF pipeline”
Best farm system in baseball with no SS or CF options! lolz
Scott, sorry for the delay in approving. You should be good to go.
RIP Charles White. One of the great Trojans.
RIP Lisa Marie Presley at age 54. Elvis’s only child.
We also just lost Jeff Beck, one of the premier rock guitarists of all time. He was 78. He replaced my favorite guitarist, Eric Clapton, on the Yardbirds. Led Zeppelin guitarist Jimmy Page recommended Beck for the gig. Eric Clapton, Jeff Beck, Jimmy Page, and Jimi Hendrix. What a wonderful era for rock guitarists.
RIP Jeff Beck.
I read that the other day. We have lost some entertainment giants the last few years.
I made reference to Jeff Beck the other day. Nobody seemed to notice. His tour bus was between Portland and SF and made a stop in Redding where he played in the old downtown theater. I was hired with some other college football players as security and stood right in front of him as he played. Amazing experience.
I would bet it was. Having met and played with some great players, I can imagine how cool something like that would be. When I met James Burton, Elvis’s lead player, I was in awe.
To answer the query on when AAV is calculated, it is at the end of the season. Not only are the salaries prorated for the time on the team, there are also incentives that need to be considered. For instance, Noah Syndergaard has $1.5MM in incentives depending on the number of IP. He will get $500K for 150 IP, $500K for 160 IP, and $500K for 170 IP. While teams that are not expected to make the playoffs will monitor those IP at the end of a season, a contender is not going to limit the PA or IP just to save $500K, especially the Dodgers.
The Dodgers are now just under $5MM over the threshold, but that can change in a heartbeat in arbitration. If AF truly wants to get under, he will be able to. $105MM drops off the payroll for 2024. They can delay getting under for a year. The small amount of tax they will incur this year, will not be onerous at all.
Wait, does this mean if Bauer is let go at the beginning of the year, his salary is pro-rated? Even if it’s fully guaranteed? Aren’t all salaries fully guaranteed on Major League deals?
Following on this Alex Eisert @FanGraphs wonders about the Rojas deal and what it may portend.
The idea of moving Trienen rather than Taylor or Muncy seems to be gaining traction in the public space. Whatever that means or doesn’t mean.
Finally, Bauer officially released and DiGiovanna has this sourced quote:
“The only guy who I know for sure would sign him is Al Davis,” one high-ranking major league executive said, referring to the renegade Oakland Raiders owner who relished his organization’s bad-boy image right up until his death in 2011.
Emphasis and wiggle room created by “for sure”.
Bauer’s contract is fully guaranteed by the Dodgers. The proration of his salary is because Bauer will not be paid for the first 50 games. They are stuck with a $22.5MM AAV deal for 2023. That is unless some team is silly enough to pay him more than ML minimum if signed. Not likely.
I keep reading about Treinen being moved. Has everyone forgotten that Treinen had shoulder labrum and rotator cuff surgery in November, and the expected recovery period is 10 months? Even if he comes back in September, who is going to pay him $8MM to pitch for maybe one month? If he does make it back, he will still will only have pitched 5.0 innings in two years. He does have a club option at $8MM, but who is going to exercise that if he cannot pitch in 2023… other than the Dodgers who did it last year?
Oh. It’s moving Treinen by attaching prospects.
Obviously Treinen himself has limited value, if that.
I understand the concept. I am just not sure what level of prospect would need to be moved to get a team to pay $8MM. I am sure they could get someone to take on Treinen if Bobby Miller or Gavin Stone were the prospect. What about Eddys Leonard or Jorbit Vivas or Maddux Bruns or Michael Grove? Would a team be willing to pay $8MM for one of those? I am not saying no team would, I just do not know at what level the prospect needs to be at before the Dodgers say no.
By the way, while I’m thinking about it, thanks for this article Bluto. I had missed it until I saw it here. It sums up quite succinctly what I was thinking about Amaya and this deal. And after thinking about it further, it feels to me like Taylor is outta here.
The Dodgers have officially released Trevor Bauer.
Will be very interesting to see if any team signs him. I don’t think he will get any offers.
NYY, NYM, San Diego, Cleveland, and Minnesota have all said they will not pursue him. i did read somewhere that Cincinnati was a possibility. The idea there would be to flip him at the deadline. I guess that is a possibility for Pittsburgh Oakland, Detroit, and KC as well.
When hearing the news on the Miguel Rojas acquisition, Max Muncy had this to say:
In this MLB Survey of executives:
https://www.mlb.com/news/mlb-front-office-selections-best-farm-systems?t=mlb-pipeline-coverage
The Dodgers ranks:
Farm: 2nd
Draft: 1st
IFA: 1st (tied)
Pitcher Dev: 2nd
Hitter Dev: 1st
Sleeper Dev: 1st
Yeah, I am working on a post. Just let me preface that I find the Farm, Draft, IFA, and Hitter Development rankings very curious.
Can’t wait to read it!
it’s quite awesome to read how well regarded and run the team is in the eyes of its peers.
Kelenic’s line while in the minors is awesome. His minor league career line that spans 4 years is:
.295.369.540.909
His career minor league K rate is 21%
His two year MLB career sucks. His line with 500 ABs is:
.168.251.338.589
His major league career K rate is 30%
Vargas career minor league line is:
.313.390.488.878 and spans 4 years
His career minor league K rate is 15.4%
Why will Verdugo hit better than Kelenic in the MLB?
If Muncy is going to play 3rd base, does that mean Vargas is destined for LF? If so, maybe a Vargas for Kelenic trade makes sense and with all trades, other players might be involved to get the trade done.
I think the Dodgers would prefer to see what Vargas can do at the major league level before trading him for a bust like Kelenic. He has shown nada. I do not want him on my team.
They’re the same age. Kelenic has what amounts to a full season of at bats. Hit .168 with them. I have no clue of his potential but there certainly is plenty of time for him.
Dylan Hernandez sure raked Kasten and Friedman this morning. Yoiks. Can’t say I totally disagree with him.
I missed that, what did he say>>>????
Basically saying that Friedman and the Dodgers management has not come out and taken responsibility or admitted to screwing the pooch on Bauer. Friedman is overrated.
Kenenic is certainly a mystery. Based on his tools and minor league success it would seem like he should do well in the majors. Even Trout was sent back down after a slow start to his major league debut.
The trade of Vargas for Kelenic if put in context of Muncy moving to third and Vargas moving to LF would give the Dodgers a good defensive center fielder with the same upside offensively as Vargas in place of a questionable defensive left fielder.
Vargas barely got a taste of the major leagues last year and didn’t take advantage of it although his cup of coffee was too brief to measure anything. Kellenic has already had two looks at the majors and is the same age as Vargas.
A Vargas for Kelenic trade would be a gamble for both teams. Vargas has better K rates where Kelenic has better power and is a better defensive player in the outfield. I think it is only a good trade if Vargas winds up in the outfield.
A lot of fans are pooh poohing this trade. I believe it makes perfect sense. Amaya is an unknown, how he would have played into the Dodgers plans is unknown. Rojas is a veteran infielder with a great glove and a decent bat. The team knows what it is getting, plus the fact there are really no veteran infielders on the bench whatsoever, now there is. Anyone here truly expect Yonny Hernandez to be with the team after spring training??? Nope.
From the Athletic:
“Rojas provides insurance at three positions, which reinforces the Dodgers elsewhere. Some combination of Muncy and Vargas can help fill in the other games at second (where Vargas has done significant work this winter) and third base, with Rojas able to backfill starts. That helps Chris Taylor spend more time in the outfield rather than in the infield.”
This makes sense to me. Utility guy. The Dodgers loves them their utility guys. He and Lux will share time at short.
Maybe his wrist will be fine. Needs some “clean up” this winter.
Well, we probably needed an OF, so Rojas allows Taylor to be that OF. Makes sense to me.
Rojas has never played the outfield. He is not playing there. They have 8 outfielders on the roster. Not a position of need.
Ardaya’s article suggested Rojas would provide insurance at 3 infield positions. Lux will still play both up the middle spots. He also said Vargas has been working a lot at second this winter. Muncy is in the utility mix too, second, third and first. Taylor is in the outfield now.
I’ve stated often I don’t like moving young guys around like that, and I still don’t. Rojas sure, he’s 34 and been around a while. Same with Taylor, and to a degree Muncy. In my opinion young players need to focus on one position. Earn a spot there and maybe later you can move around.
Rojas is a pro,
I have to laugh at some of the idiotic trade ideas I have been seeing. One guy suggested we trade Taylor, Thompson and a minor league pitcher for Ian Happ. Now, Ian Happ is a good player no doubt. But he also is a strikeout machine with one less K last season than Bellinger. They are teammates now, and between them they struck out 299 times last season. His other idea was even dumber, trading those two guys and a minor league pitcher to the Guardians for Ramirez, Naylor, and Rosario. Never happen.
Happ works for me. 28, 4 WAR, .800 OPS, not that expensive and is a free agent in ‘24, which means, like Rojas, could be a rental. Not sure what he’s worth. Taylor, yes, after that some A talent. And unless things have changed, it’s not about strikeouts in Friedmanville, it’s about OPS. I’m used to that now so if it’s gone back to contact, I’m fine with it but someone needs to let me know.
oh, Hernandez said “Dodgers refuse to own their fiasco” then explained why. Dodgers aren’t as smart as they think they are, ignoring the mounting evidence that proves what they’re doing doesn’t work. Bauer leads the list of course, and he said something about playoff “chokes”. He also referenced the use of Roberts as a “meat shield”. Loved that one. He ends with something of a contradiction, depending on p.o.v. He said management isn’t holding itself accountable because it knows the public won’t, and though the reputation may be damaged, the organization is still making money. And I’ll add, isn’t that the bottom line?
Yes it is and they are not in the game to lose money. 5 players avoided arbitration. Smith, Thompson, Buehler, who will get 8.1 to not pitch, May, Ferguson, Soto gets 23 mil from the Pads. Smith’s deal is for a little over 5 mil.
ok, where does that put us against the CBT?
Smith for $5 million? What a deal.
$5 million is a big paycheck but there are so many players making so much more and doing so much less.
Urias just settled for a little over 14 mil.
With only Gonsolin and Phillips, the two super two cases, still to sign, the Dodgers are $1.075 over the projection thus far. That would have put them over the CBT. I think the Dodgers did the pencil work and came to the conclusion they were going over on arbitration and decided to trade for Rojas. That does not change the fact if they were going to stay under they would have to move someone…CT3 or Muncy. I still do not buy into Treinen and a prospect scenario.
Evan Phillips has agreed to a $1.3MM contract. This now brings the arbitration salaries to $975K over the projection, with only Tony Gonsolin needing to sign. Gonsolin’s projected salary was $3.5MM.
$5.25 million for a 4 WAR catcher is a great deal for the Dodgers.
Buehler $8M and he probably will not pitch an inning in 2023. How does that work? Are we just paying to retain his rights? Seems like they should have worked out some sort of 2 or 3 year extension.
They did that two years ago, He is eligible for free agency after the 24 season.
Spotrac says the A’s 2023 payroll will be approximately 38 million.
The Dodgers will be paying Buehler and Bauer over 30 million not to pitch this year.
Plus millions in deferred money they still are paying others.
I forgot Treinen, another 8 mil.
So, even without the deferred $, that equals the entire A’s payroll.
Well I thought I had figured we were a (-)Taylor away from being under the cap.
Nope.
I have no idea what’s going on, but I trust Friedman does. If it matters, do it. If it doesn’t matter don’t do it. We’ve only got weeks of this left before we play several weeks of games that don’t count. I don’t care. We’ll have a good team that will be competitive, probably be favored to do something, then the playoffs will happen. Nearly 9 months from now. That’s a pregnant amount of time and anyone who’s been through a pregnancy knows how long that process can be.
So we wait.